Video
Summary
Description
Key ideas include:
* Why plans must be adapted to each institutional context
* A practical planning workflow (threats → vulnerabilities → risk mapping → resources → mitigation/response → quality control)
* How “hard” (hierarchical) organizations differ from “soft” (informal) environments
* Why Incident Command System (ICS) can help coordination, but has limits in large disasters
* Why disasters exceed local coping capacity in more ways than logistics—especially in situational understanding
* The core shift: in disaster planning, the most important “plan” is often the network of relationships, not the document